religion englannista suomeksi
1902, (w), ''The Varieties of Religious Experience'', Lecture 2:
- Most books on the philosophy of religion try to begin with a precise definition of what its essence consists of. ... I shall not be pedantic enough to enumerate any of them to you now. Meanwhile the very fact that they are so many and so different from one another is enough to prove that the word “religion” cannot stand for any single principle or essence, but is rather a collective name.
(ux) is a new religion but Zoroastrianism is an old religion.
(quote-book)|url= https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=svJeAAAAcAAJ|chapter=Sect. V. Truths relating to the Deity. Of his exiſtence, perfection, providence, &c.|passage=Ignorant and ſuperſtitious wretches meaſure the actions of ''letterd'' and ''philoſophical'' men by the tattle of their nurſes or illiterate parents and companions, or by the faſhion of the country : and people of differing religions judge and condemn each other by their own tenents ; when ''both'' of them cannot be in the right, and it is well if ''either'' of them are.
(RQ:Florio Montaigne Essayes)
Indoctrinate into a specific religion.
1890, John R. Kelso, Deity analyzed: In six lectures - Page 37
- To men whose minds are thus religioned, tied back to gods that never advance, there can never be any such word as progress
2011, Andrew O'Shea, Pedagogy, Oppression and Transformation in a 'Post-Critical' Climate, p 116
- The ideas expressed above challenge us to continuously rupture and interrupt racialized, classed, gendered, religioned and sexualized norms that inhere between and within institutions, understandings of bodies and our Selves.